We're All Mad Here: Sucker Punch Tackles Abuse In Asylums

This post discusses abuse in asylums, including sexual assault. It discusses the history of lobotomies and describes (briefly) the procedure. It also contains spoilers for the movie Sucker Punch.

I went to see Sucker Punch expecting a light peice of fluff that involved conventionally attractive young women with swords fighting a dragon. It's a movie where one of the lines highlighted in the trailer is, "If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything." I was prepared for a light popcorn-type film and showed up for a midnight screening with one of my friends, two martinis to the wind.

I was really not expecting a film that laid out how abusive asylums and long-term care centers can be—and often are. I was not expecting a film that laid out how asylums could be used to silence uppity women. And I was really not prepared for a film that showed bluntly and horrifyingly what lobotomies involved and how they completely destroyed people's personalities.

[Full transcript and description of the trailer]

There are very few scenes that take place in the asylum itself, but those that do are very powerful in their brevity.

Baby Doll's stepfather has discovered, to his rage, that his wife left all of her considerable fortune to her two daughters. However, the two girls are still young, and he is easily able to lock them in their rooms. He attempts to attack Baby Doll, but when that fails, he turns his attentions to her unnamed sister. Baby Doll grabs a gun to stop him, but in the struggle it's her sister who dies.

Using his appearance as a fine, respectable man, the stepfather has Baby Doll drugged and dragged into the asylum. What a great way of silencing a girl who could lead to your downfall. It's very clear in these scenes that the stepfather is bribing people, especially the head orderly (Blue), to have Baby Doll "taken care of." And by "taken care of," he means being lobotomized.

Neurologist Egas Moniz, who invented the lobotomy as a form of psychiatric treatment, was awarded the 1949 Nobel Prize for his work. Moniz was well aware of what the results of a prefontal lobotomy would be on his patients. The famous case of Phineas Gage, a railroad worker who had a spike driven through his frontal lobe in an accident, had occured in 1848, sparking a series of neurological inquiries into the effects of such injuries. According to author Robert Whitaker:

The injury dramatically changed him. Before, others had admired him as energetic, shrewd, and persistent. He was said to have a well-balanced mind. After his accident, he became ill mannered, stubborn, and rude. He couldn't carry out any plans. He seemed to have the mind of a spoiled child. He had changed so radically that his friends concluded that he was "no longer Gage." [Mad in America, pg 108]

Whitaker goes on to describe Moniz's inspiration for performing lobotomies on people with mental health conditions. An all-day conference was held in 1935 that discussed the numerous cases of accidental lobotomies of cancer patients and veterans of World War One, in addition to the effects of lobotomies on dogs, monkeys, foxes, and apes. According to another attendee of the conference, "any damage to the frontal lobes would inevitably be followed by grave repercussions upon the whole personality." (pg 112) So obviously it should be used on mental health patients.

Victims of lobotomies are still alive today. Howard Dully was 12 years old when he received the same sort of lobotomy, which uses an ice pick, that Baby Doll is scheduled for. He was lobotomized because "He objects to going to bed but then sleeps well. He does a good deal of daydreaming and when asked about it he says 'I don't know.' He turns the room's lights on when there is broad sunlight outside."

As Baby Doll awaits her fate, her clothing is taken away, replaced with an asylum-issued grey uniform. She is also given asylum-issued sheets and towels for her dorm-room bed. Depending on what modern asylum a patient is sent to, the same thing can happen now. A friend of mine who has been involuntarily institutionalized three times told me that two of the institutions took away her clothing, one as a "safety issue," the other in order to ensure compliance with asylum rules. Clothing would be returned for good behavior. As well, some modern institutions allow private rooms, others do not. The expectation in a shared room is often that the patients will take on some responsibility for each other, as the girls do in Sucker Punch. In Sucker Punch, however, the girls give up everything, including their names. (Unless you believe their parents named them Baby Doll, Sweat Pea, Rocket, Blondie, and Amber.)

As the head orderly, Blue, leads Baby Doll and her stepfather into the common area of the asylum, he reveals how the girls—and this asylum is full of girls that appear to be around 17 or 18 years of age (Baby Doll is 20), most of whom are white—are treated. The common area is concrete, all in shades of grey, and we see some of the girls listlessly playing cards while two others get into a fight. It's a very bleak place. Part of the treatment involves the girls doing physical labor around the asylum, much like the labor required of inmates in 19th century asylums in Canada. (I recommend Geoffrey Reaume's book Remembrances of Patients Past to read more about this.)

On the stage in this room the chief doctor, a Polish woman named Dr. Gorski, is leading one of the inmates through some sort of directed session. Blue comments to Baby Doll's stepfather that watching the girls through this therapy is "quite a show," since they act out the people who "touched them or beat them or whatever." Blue and the stepfather negotiate the terms of Baby Doll's lobotomy while Dr. Gorski tells Sweet Pea "You are safe. It's all safe. Now relax, and just let go. You control this world. Let the pain go. Let the hurt go. Let the guilt go. What you're imagining right now. That world you control. That place can be as real as any pain."

It's implied throughout the scenes in the asylum—and later outright stated—that the girls are being sexually abused and raped by the orderlies. This is also based on reality. Inmates were sexually abused and exploited at the Byberry Asylum in Philadelphia, the Woodlands School in Westminster, British Columbia, and the Magdalen Asylums in Ireland, amongst others. A survey by the Disabled Women's Network Ontario makes it clear that sexual abuse of women with disabilities is epidemic, even today. Women with histories of mental illness are less likely to be believed when they report their rapes and assaults.

Baby Doll's fate is sealed by her stepfather's bribe to Blue. We see a series of scenes of her in the asylum, leading up to the day of her lobotomy. They're all silent—Baby Doll never says a word during any of the asylum scenes—and end with the lobotomy doctor coming to the hospital to perform the ice pick lobotomy. The film is surprisingly blunt about what this will involve: the camera focuses on a drawing of what a lobotomy actually does, with the ice-pick like instrument being held up to the eye and a hammer poised to strike. Baby Doll is tied down. The lobotomy doctor gets the hammer out, puts the instrument at her eye, and pulls back the hammer.

Then the scene ends, flashing to the brothel that is the setting for most of the rest of the film. Many of the above scenes are replayed, with Baby Doll re-imagining the whole experience as being locked in a brothel rather than an asylum, kept trapped for five days waiting for "the High Roller" to "do a little flower picking." Instead of her stepfather, it's a priest dragging her in from the orphanage. The scene on the stage is changed to Sweet Pea talking about this whole "creepy lobotomy thing"—what sort of "issue" do you have to have to want to have sex with a "lobotomized vegetable"? The rooms are re-imagined as places where the girls will "entertain" visitors. Dr. Gorski is re-imagined as a dance instructor who teaches the girls to dance sexily on the stage for their patrons.

I read Baby Doll's re-imagining of the asylum as a brothel as representing the rape and sexual abuse of the inmates by the orderlies. Baby Doll imagines this as a brothel because that's what she's got to go on. She knows they're being forced to perform their abuse for the entertainment of the orderlies, even if that's not what Gorski was intending. The "dancing" that Baby Doll envisions may be her own sessions with Gorski (Gorski repeats the same sentences she said to Sweat Pea during the earlier session), or they may be how she sends her mind away while being raped. Within the storyline, she's got the other girls doing things like getting copies of the map to the brothel that is really an asylum, getting a lighter so they can start a fire to distract anyone who's following them, getting a knife so they can defend themselves as they try to escape, and a key to unlock the doors.

At the end of the movie, Baby Doll realizes exactly how far she'll have to go to protect the other girls and allow any of them to escape. She lets herself be captured by the men in the brothel, and then we flash instantly back to with no warning to that hammer slamming down on the icepick, and the lobotomy doctor dropping the now-bloody icepick into water to clean it.

As Dr. Gorski and the doctor talk about the lobotomy, it becomes clear that Gorski didn't sign the papers to schedule it. As the doctors are realizing the extent of Blue's abuse of the patients, we see Blue and several other orderlies carrying the limp Baby Doll into an isolated washroom and tying her to a chair. While the other orderlies refuse to hurt her anymore, Blue orders them away because he, at least, is going to get his satisfaction.

Before Blue, who is enraged that Baby Doll is no longer reacting to his abuse, has a chance to rape her again, the police and both doctors break into the bathroom and drag him away. As Blue screams that it's not fair that Baby Doll has "escaped to paradise," we finally see her face post-lobotomy: she has a beatific smile and it's implied that she's lost in her imaginings of paradise, forever safe from anything that Blue can do to her, and content in the knowledge that she saved others from his abuse.

I know, that's an awful lot of typing for what amounts to less than 20 minutes of a nearly two-hour long film that's mostly stylized scenes of young women in sexy outfits fighting steampunk zombie Nazis and shooting bi-planes out of the sky with hand-guns. On the other hand, I'm fascinated that a movie that spends most of its time on exactly that sets things up by showing exactly how frighting being involuntarily committed can be. It's pretty bluntly stated that Baby Doll is being abused and lobotomized because there are corrupt people who are willing to do these things to her for a price.

I read this film as being critical of asylums, albeit in a way that puts the blame on individual orderlies rather than on a system that allowed limited oversight and gave unlimited power. This is still an ongoing problem.

What I'm unsure of is if the purpose of these scenes is to be frightening for the sake of being frightening, or if Zack Snyder, the director of the film, is trying to use the asylum as a metaphor for how women are treated when they're uppity, when they try and fight back, or when they're simply "bad girls." It's notable that the only woman with any appearance of power, Dr. Gorski, is shown as completely impotent throughout the film, unable in the asylum to realize how much abuse is going on under her nose, and unable in the brothel to protect her charges from Blue's abuse.

Regardless, Sucker Punch packs a pretty strong wallop. I enjoyed a lot of it, but I wish someone had warned me that a lobotomy was going to be a major plot point.

What are your thoughts on the film?

Note on these "Further Readings": Sucker Punch generated a lot of commentary back in March. I've tried to grab a sampling from various points of view, although this is by no means the whole picture of the conversation. Please feel free to link to your own or other people's commentary on the film.

Further Reading:

  • Sady Doyle at the Atlantic: 'Sucker Punch' and the Decline of Strong Woman Action Heroines ("Zack Snyder's critically panned, commercially disappointing mess of a film represents the nadir of female-centric action movies"
  • Impertinence: I include a Buffy Reference in this post ("So this was a movie about trauma, basically. It was also about dragons and clockwork Nazis and shit blowing up, because it was an action movie. But it was an action movie with themes, and those themes were misogyny and trauma.")
  • Impertinence: Me, too: Sucker Punch and mainstream feminism ("Sucker Punch really hit me emotionally because it portrayed prolonged abuse, attempted rape, and dissociation in ways that rang as very emotionally accurate to me. This was coupled with violent revenge fantasy fodder and a message that spoke to finding inner strength.")
  • Maria & Leigh at The Hathor Legacy: Sucker Punch (Spoilers Ahoy!) (" I was definitely not expecting what we got in this movie. From what I had read (which was admittedly very little) it was supposedly a very fluffy action movie, and instead we got a visually gorgeous and really thoughtful film that put a lot of effort into portraying its ideas without 1. slamming you over the head with them and 2. without being insulting.")
  • Dave at the Boston Area Rape Crisis Center Blog: Movie Review: Sucker Punch ("Aside from the fresh action sequences involving dragons, samurai with miniguns, WWI era clockwork Germans, and robots, Sucker Punch is probably the best movie about dissociation I've ever seen.")
  • Katie at A Blog of My Own: Sucker Pucnhing Your Audience is not a good idea; or, I know you're trying to tell me something, but I just don't know what it is ("Now, I think that (my best guess at) what Zach Snyder et al. were trying to say is that sex is not a form of female empowerment and that there are no real forms of female empowerment whatsoever. However, that is just not acceptable.")
  • Thea Lim at Bitch: Generlicious: Zack Snyder and Sucker Punch ("And let's not even get into the fact that Snyder's main character (characters?) is meant to arouse our sympathies simply by being that distillation of all that needs to be protected and cherished: the perfectly petite, panty-wearing blond virgin.")
  • Skye at Heroine Content March Links: Sucker Punch Edition ("I just keep thinking about how cool it could have been if the fantasy war scenes were actually what the girls themselves would have chosen, instead of what Zack Snyder claims we chose for them...")
  • ETA: Skye at Heroine Content: Sucker Punch: Such a Waste of Potential ("White girls in this film have the choice of valiant sacrifice to save friends, or escape to live a long and happy life. Brown girls are support staff, betrayers, and victims.")

Previously: We're all mad here: Mental Illness in YA Fiction, We're All Mad Here: Case Studies in Pop Culture Therapy

(Admin note: Still having irritating computer problems. I'm sorry I'm way less available than I intended to be.)

Comments

27 comments have been made. Post a comment.

Yes!

This is a great perspective of the film. I also related to the sisterhood of the cast. Here was my take on it: http://www.examiner.com/feminism-in-chicago/review-sucker-punch-passes-b...

I can't believe that you

I can't believe that you managed to look past all of the blatant misogyny (and quite frankly, misandry as well), in order to find this to praise.

Shame on you. I'm sure there are far better examples of this kind of portrayal in other media that didn't happen to both offend and bore a majority of their audience. I would rather those have been highlighted.

As someone who is deeply offended by misogyny ...

I agree with this anonymous. Strike another low for bitchmedia.

Did you not see the comments during your subscription drive of those professing to have been alienated by you? Now count me among them. If you cannot recognize and call out misogyny in everyday pop culture, which is also how feminism works alongside calling out sexism, I seriously suggest (re?)educating yourselves on it and calling it out when necessary ... or your next sub/donor drive just might not succeed.

The alineated are watching you ...

Hey, give this film a chance!

It is by no means, perfect, and yes, there is misogyny in it. But like the author of the piece I found more reasons to praise it than pan it, much of which already explained here.

Hi Anonymous, As Anna pointed

Hi Anonymous,

As Anna pointed out in the intro to this post, her goal here was to analyze the depiction of asylums in this film, not to review it as a whole (she also points out the rape and abuse that the women in the film suffer, so I hardly think she's giving it a pass when it comes to misogyny). A cultural artifact can have both problematic and positive elements, as I'm sure you are aware, and just because Anna found something positive to say about the film doesn't mean that she needs to be "(re?)educated." Considering that she links to no less than eight reviews of the film, you can hardly say that she doesn't do her homework.

As far as your "watching us" is concerned, making threats is not going to have an impact on what we publish here. I'm sorry that you didn't like this particular post, but we are certainly not going to start letting anonymous complaints dictate the tone or content of this website.

____________
Kelsey Wallace, contributor

Ask me about our Comments Policy!

yup

Just wanted to add my comment in with the dissenters. I have brought this movie up on previous posts ( on bust blogs as well as this one I think) about this issue that is more apparent than the one you chose to focus on. It should have at least been mentioned! just a little surprised since it was so blatant....

Asylums in Sucker Punch

I'm sorry, i think I'm confused by your comment. I read you as saying that you think that the misogyny in the film is more important to discuss than the depiction of abuse in asylums. I think this was covered by linking to several blog posts that discuss exactly that, especially Sady's post at the Atlantic. This series is specifically about depictions of mental illness in pop culture, which was why this post focused on that aspect of the film.

Of course, I could be reading you incorrectly. Please let me know if I am! It's been a very long day.

Yes!! I agree!

I am so glad to have finally found a take on the movie that I can relate to (and thanks for the links as I couldnt find any reviews that discussed the pros of this movie).

It seems most reviewers get caught up in the costumes (which I would say speaks more to the feeling of the characters to always being on display) and dismissed the fight scenes as mere fantasy of teen boys (and I dont want to even get into the whole, teen boys are all heterosexual and want girls in skimpy costumes trope) and not a dissociation where baby doll and her friends could fight their oppressors even in their revealing costumes (all the more showing that the costumes stand for another layer of oppression which, in the fantasy world, they challenge by kicking ass in those clothes)

This movie also ties into themes of sisterhood and women looking out for one another, enough so that they are willing to die for each other. Also, the theme of finding power and confidence in a seemingly hopeless situation. In the movie they also cry openly, something generally withheld from strong female characters (being more masculine = good) and this is a story explicitly about women's issues. It is clear that these dissociations are a way of making sense and processing violence and oppression.

I will not claim that there are no problematic aspects to this film. Ill return to the costumes: while I do think they can be interpreted as another layer of oppression the girls feel, they also work to make the movie more (hetero)male friendly and that is not merely a coincidence.

Anyways, I'll wrap up by saying, give sucker punch another chance. Read the pro-sucker punch/ not explicitly anti-sucker punch reviews and then watch it again.
Plus, the action sequences are AWESOME!! and the visuals GORGEOUS!!

I have to admit....

I have to admit, trj, when people ask me about the film I tell them it's terrible, I can't recommend it, and I loved it. I think people need to go into it knowing exactly what it's about and decide if that's what they want to deal with. I mostly love the action sequences, the visuals, and the music, and the cheesy over-the-top of it.

I agree that one can interpret the costumes as the "always on display" aspect. I'm not sure I do, because I think it implies a level of depth that isn't really there. On the other hand, I've tried to avoid reading Snyder's mind on this, so maybe that was his goal. I'm not sure.

I was very excited when it came out to read a lot of people talking about it, both people who really liked it and people who didn't. I liked seeing people really getting into the themes of the film. But it is certainly not for everyone. The middle part really is one long music-video.

Regarding "getting caught up

Regarding "getting caught up in the costumes":

Maybe the ridiculous degree of pornulation was there to underline how profoundly the female characters, even/expecially Gorski, were denied agency, but I would still pin it down under contributing to the problem instead of "exposing" (much less solving) it. Because dang, who would have guessed that dressing sexy in a context where you're only viewed as a piece of meat anyway is yet another facet to one's disempowerment? Female oppression and suffering are the ultimate wank material already. There is nothing left to expose.

There is a world of difference between addressing a theme or an issue in a movie and using that theme/issue as a plot vehicle. I'm not quite sure which one this movie did with the asylum theme or outfits, most likely something in between, but there were good moments too. The exchange between Baby Doll and Rocket after Baby Doll rescued her from being assaulted by the cook almost made me cry:

"Thank you. For the cook."
"That's nothing."
"Shut up! No one takes a risk for anyone in here."

That's how policing women's compliance with their decreed roles within the virgin-whore-continuum is so often the duty of other women, and how damaging that is especially to female-female-relationships within the family (mother-daughter, sister-sister)—all of which can be found in the movie, with Gorski as the formidable but ultimately powerless older lady mentor whose only job is to teach the girls to survive their oppressor/oppression (Blue, the asylum in general), and the Sweet Pea dynamic.

On a more personal note, I too hate Baby Doll and the "useful girls" not surviving and Sweet Pea getting to have a life after being such a whiney wet banket almost throughout the movie. And why did the mentor have to be an old dude? Why not Joan Jett or someone cool? I was glad that despite the enraging costume choices, ridiculous cgi fight scenes and general snydering there was some actual exposing of oppressive institutions being done after all, although I can see how the movie could have worked better as "just" fluff.

Yes again!

Sucker Punch is one of this year's movies that I find myself constantly going back to. I've defended it so many times that I'm practically cheerleading for Snyder at this point. Zack Snyder makes satires, very smart satires of the things enjoyed by straight white guys of the nerd variety. He's actually gone on record as saying that he intended Sucker Punch to be his commentary on the objectification of women. That the movie uses imagery of women in asylums (itself, as you very nicely put it, a loaded subject) is just gravy.

Really? This empty shell of a

Really? This empty shell of a movie is supposed to be some great message of sisterhood and female strength? The only girl that survives is the one who bitched and moaned and dragged her feet every step of the way. Every girl that participated in the scheme, that dreamed of a life beyond the asylum/brothel, that stood up and fought for her freedom died. Every fucking one. Who lives? Fucking Sweat Pea who probably can't even tie her shoes in the morning without a man telling her too. Even in the end when Baby Doll has sacrificed herself to facilitate her escape, Sweat Pea is nothing more than a silent mound of indecision and weakness waiting for a man to step in and save her. Which Scott Glam's Wise Man totally does because mentorship is for cannon fodder; the only girl's that deserve to be rescued are the nice biddable ones who you can trust to undermine other uppity women.

agreed

I whole heartedly agree with @Scrumby. While I like the optimism of the author, this blog post does so much more for awareness and historical perspective of the relationship between women, lobotomies and asylums than that exploitation film ever will. In short, I think it is telling that in the film, the women fantasize about being in male fantasies, i.e., being stripers and super soldiers, mind you not at the same time - though machine gun scenes come complete with scanty clothing. All the while, the *reality* is that they are powerless. Do we see one true moment of power rewarded, if even in the heart? No. Do we see hot babes "dancing" and shooting weapons. Yes. That is the simple answer. What is the final outcome? Death to the body, mind and spirit of women after women. It's true, not all films have happy endings, but don't sell it to me as a message. And although the film uses abuse as a starting point, it only serves as a place to root the *perceived* other side of that coin, which, to my mind, doesn't happen to be fantasy driven supernatural "dancing" skills and commando moves in rubber. What's worse, the marketing people tried to sell it to us under the guise of empowering women. This author makes a better case, if not for the film, the underlying issue. Nevertheless, to the marketing creeps at WB, I say, Pfft.

Read this folks: http://io9.com/5785590/sucker-punch-goes-beyond-awful-to-become-commenta...

And look up Gail Simone's brilliant (if unkempt) webpage WIR "Women in Refrigerators" for an examination of how many women are de-powered, made mindless and killed in comics.

Dead women in film

I found the number of women who died in this film really disturbing. It's unclear to me whether Amber and Blondie actually die, or are also lobotomized in it. they just disappear entirely from the story, as though their true fate doesn't matter.

Certainly there are a lot of things to critique in this movie, and I don't actually recommend it to anyone. Did you read Sady's review over at The Atlantic? I think you'll agree with a lot of that one. This is really supposed to be focusing on the asylum and mental health aspects of the film, not any other part of it.

Thanks for that

My reaction to the film, from the very first scenes to the very end, was this is an exploitation piece. Pure. Simple. I came to this site specifically to find a discussion along these lines about the film. I was surprised by the author's appreciation and even affection for the film. And honestly, I'm a little shocked by the amount of support from others posting here. I thought the movie was about as obvious as the sexy-costume situation. And your comment, rubber ducky, pretty much sums up my frustration and resentment. Thank you.

Thanks for the link love!

Here is my actual review of the film, in addition to the link roundup referenced above: http://www.heroinecontent.net/archives/2011/03/sucker-punch.html

Thank you Skye!

That's a great review, Skye! I wish I had seen it earlier. I'm going to edit the post to include it at the link list. :D

I haven't seen the film

I had wanted to, because the trailers made it look like it was full of pretty sets, costumes, etc (one of the main reasons I will see a movie rather than read a book). Now I'm glad I didn't, as I don't like lobotomies in my fluff.

I found this article on it's portrayal of abuse in institutions enlightening, and I read some of the negative links people posted. Now I have a question. What exactly makes is misogynistic? Having not seen it, I can't offer my opinion. I can certainly see why it's not empowering.

Interesting post!

Thanks for this post, Anna. I had no idea of the history of lobotomies, and though I was (and still am) not exactly excited to watch Sucker Punch due to its general reception when it was released, I may have to check it out because of the themes discussed in your post. Thank you for posting such an interesting and nuanced look at this film!

loqgta Ugg Suomi deb9

IvfeLRKN [url=http://www.uggaustraliansuomi.info/]Ugg Suomi[/url]
raseEHXfv http://www.goedkopeuggsonlinekopen.info/
qvxcmqdigm [url=http://uggcheapdanmark.info/#3092]Ugg Støvler[/url]
VHNwSfhoy etuvcj [url=http://uggcheapdanmark.info/]Ugg Støvler I Danmark[/url]
NekDCSSAaql SjzxWJQQ [url=http://uggsonlineshopschweiz.info/]Ugg Zürich[/url]
haqdAWEgw TvdaVSOZ http://www.uggbootsforswitzerland.info/
prajZVDzs

louis vuittonoo37

[url=http://www.cheapbagsinlouisvuittonstore.com][b]louis vuitton outlet[/b][/url] Some fans don't you think doubt should the NBA arenas and uniforms,even though others just be happy with basketball at its number one levelMost Important FactorYou he is under draw attention away from your goals written down and have several copies available

[url=http://www.cheapbagsinlouisvuittonstore.com][b]louis vuitton outlet[/b][/url] The pressure decide to put all around the transfer for more information about an expansion about stainless,as well as for clamping tool Really a little as though occurs any a period scorpions learn for more information about accept that full - blown deserve by far the most effective

[url=http://www.bigsalelouisvuitton.com][b]louis vuitton[/b][/url] To be successful in your making money as puzzle shopper,all your family members are going to want for additional details on take element down and dirty just like any several jobOpposite QualityHonesty

[url=http://www.bigsalelouisvuitton.com][b]louis vuitton outlet[/b][/url] To exceed expectations a resource box off, I either had a multi function friend which of you distributes print travel advertising begin to educate yourself regarding let me know easiest way in the age regarding Tivo, broadcast advertising was an all in one short-timer as part of your marketing mixture Great Plains Dexterity Custom Screens

[url=http://www.louisvuittonoutletrelax.com][b]www.louisvuittonoutletrelax.com[/b][/url] Be beautiful and show enthusiasmAnd make sure it's real Always disconnect and handle them allowing you to have care, and always decide to put them back alive

[url=http://www.bigsalelouisvuitton.com][b]louis vuitton outlet[/b][/url] Of course several unique is that the assume that an does practically never really reveal oneself to educate yourself regarding God right through any of these practices,now that aspect usually assumed that God already knows everything; going to be the experience in the field having to do with being known on such basis as God is always that really just a multi functional result about coming for more information regarding are aware of that oneself much better completely spiritual practices If all your family members really want to explore get the hang of all the way up to have any of those back and forth from your past element is this easily accomplished if you don't have going to be the will want to learn more about tend to be for additional details on an organized senior high school event
[url=http://www.cheapbagsinlouisvuittonstore.com/Louis-Vuitton-6-Key-Hollder-M60165-1332.html]Louis Vuitton 6 Key Hollder M60165[/url]
[url=http://www.cheapbagsinlouisvuittonstore.com/Louis-Vuitton-Sarah-Wallet-M93635-653.html]Louis Vuitton Sarah Wallet M93635[/url]
[url=http://www.cheapbagsinlouisvuittonstore.com/Louis-Vuitton-Odeon-M56389-1290.html]Louis Vuitton Odeon M56389[/url]

mhpazz Nike Free Run dmr6

WnuyQAIM [url=http://monclerjassen.webspawner.com/]Moncler Jas[/url]
jwksUFJxi http://vestemoncler0.webnode.fr/
zrzfmnqqqn [url=http://monclerpiumini.webspawner.com/#3987]Piumini Moncler[/url]
LMOxMjlrb rwwknn [url=http://monclerjassen.webspawner.com/]Moncler Jas[/url]
PzbOWTAThrf DpoyKDLK [url=http://monclerpiumini.webspawner.com/]Piumini Moncler[/url]
ognyXGIlx TuksJFEP http://monclerjassen.webspawner.com/
krglGHEdb

ttytsl Ugg Soldes lzd0

OwxgPFYG [url=http://cheapuggsuk0.webspawner.com/]Cheap Uggs Uk[/url]
mdplVRVua http://monclerpascher0.webspawner.com/
hcxrvtykmt [url=http://canadagoosejakke.cabanova.com/#5606]Canada Goose Jakke[/url]
HHGzLpxjn cijexg [url=http://canadagoosejacket0.webs.com/]Canada Goose Jacket[/url]
KqrGUOCLrfu QqotQPWM [url=http://monclerbebe.meabilis.fr/]Moncler Bebe[/url]
dmuvEAMbs GczxMPKC http://cheapuggsuk0.webspawner.com/
jhohZTVht

rwoohd Mbt Kisumu ZIOUq agk0

WlmrUOVH [url=http://imkris901106.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=226750]Adidas Jeremy Scott SXgZB[/url]
urkrSSYiw http://life77.tw/viewthread.php?tid=146180&extra=
sverrrvwoz PITpDkixf vhmrci [url=http://jilinsou.com/plus/view.php?aid=83069]Mbt Suisse ZQrDG[/url]
TnoXPCMYimh TmdjKLFU [url=http://www.centralyp.info/viewthread.php?tid=1872273&extra=]Mbt Keng?t Edullisesti LIXEw[/url]
cemkUTRvf SkvjPKIV http://www.iqing.cn/home.php?h=5275&app=blog&id=146260&user_id=5275
tyttXIJaq

poy9x

[b][/b]

[b][/b]

[b][/b]

[b][/b]

[b][/b]

qqy8t

[b][/b]

[b][/b]

[b][/b]

[b][/b]

[b][/b]

bdq4m

[b][/b]

[b][/b]

[b][/b]

[b][/b]

[b][/b]