Subscribe to Bitch on Sale and help us reach our goal by Sept 30! Subscribe Renew Become a member Image Map

The Sudden Pink War: Making Sense of the Komen/Planned Parenthood Rift

two white women arguing at a rally

By now, chances are you've seen the news that the Susan G. Komen Foundation defunded its support of Planned Parenthood, which it had established in 2005. Pressure for the foundation to stop the support began almost immediately, and the national Susan G. Komen board resisted this pressure until yesterday. I spoke with Gina Popovic, Executive Vice President of the Planned Parenthood of Greater Washington and North Idaho, who stressed that Komen is not the bad actor in all of this, the anti-choice activists are.

"We don't want a pink on pink war," said Ms. Popovic. 

One of the first thoughts to cross my mind when I read the headline on the Washington Post about Komen's PP defunding was the completely inaccurate statement that Senator John Kyl made last April: 

Everybody goes to clinics, to hospitals, to doctors, and so on. Some people go to Planned Parenthood. But you don't have to go to Planned Parenthood to get your cholesterol or your blood pressure checked. If you want an abortion, you go to Planned Parenthood, and that's well over 90 percent of what Planned Parenthood does.

In greater context, Planned Parenthood has been in the crosshairs of anti-choice activists for many years now. They've survived the threat of a federal ban on funding, even when they perform annual exam services and do preventive care. They dodged an attempt last year on the part of a few Republican-led state legislatures to take away their Medicare funding because the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services itself stepped in and told those states they would lose all of their Medicare funding if they tried to strip abortion providers like Planned Parenthood of their support.

Since the 2012 midterm elections, all manner of anti-choice bills have wended their ways through state chambers, many getting signed into law. Extended waiting periods to terminate a pregnancy are some of the newer ways to push back the window of choice for women; if a state has legalized a cutoff of 20 weeks to receive an abortion, then insisting on a 14-day waiting period essentially shortens that cutoff to 18 weeks. Bans on later-term abortions, insisting that clients watch ultrasound of their embryos, stricter provisions on informing whoever is assumed to have paternity, or one's own parents have all had a floor debate in the states.

Even beyond the legislative measures, anti-abortion rhetoric has notched up during the GOP primary season in advance of this summer's general election, as Republican candidates jockeyed for attention from the electorate. Herman Cain insisted he was against abortion even in cases of rape or incest. Rick Santorum suggested rape victims should "make the best out of a bad situation" and take their pregnancies to term. Rick Perry, formerly softer on the issue of abortion, made the case that he had gone through a "transformation" and now only supported making all abortion illegal, no matter the circumstances. Across the country, the pressure is relentless to find new, inventive, and clever ways to shut down a woman's right to reproductive choice.

The reporting on the anti-abortion fervor on the Susan G. Komen national board threw out large dollar figures that now won't be flowing to Planned Parenthood affiliates across the country. Looking at the numbers for my local PPGWNI organization humanizes the stakes for me: 300 women who came in to the ten Planned Parenthood offices in eastern Washington and Idaho last year were referred to specialists for advanced breast health care, paid for by the Komen funds. Since 2008 PPGWNI received just under $80,000 from Komen. The money they took in was paid out in nurses' salaries and in specialists' fees when patients were referred for care. And without this money, some women will be turned away. The stakes for women's health could not be higher—already there are known disparities in health care quality and outcomes for poorer women and women who are underinsured or uninsured.

Breast cancer remains the second most common cancer among women in the United States, and socioeconomic status has been shown to be a significant factor in the stage at which breast cancer is diagnosed, as well as mortality.

Karl Eastlund, President and CEO of PPGWNI, said, "This is really unfortunate for women. There's a sad reality here." 

Indeed, when one pulls back from the abstract anti-choice messaging about ending abortion in the United States, we see that we're also taking away women's access to health care. And not just women, but some of the most vulnerable women who utilize low-cost and free clinics for their preventative and urgent care, for family planning, and for treatment. Perhaps there's a difference then, between "women's health" and "feminist health." While the Susan G. Komen Foundation continues to tout its emphasis on early screening and detection, it won't be supporting such activities if they occur at clinics that someone on Capitol Hill has decided to investigate

In response, PPGWNI has established the Emergency Breast Health Fund, and Mr. Eastlund reports that just this morning donors are walking into his office with checks of support. Certainly Komen has seen a wave of anger on its Facebook and Twitter pages, with many women declaring they will no longer participate in their fundraising. Many of Komen's local boards across the country are also disappointed and dismayed, as they received news of the national Komen group's new rule making in the same email that was sent to Planned Parenthood affiliates. If this truly is a case where a vocal few have overruled a majority, more changes may be afoot at the smaller local Komen boards. But the national Komen board is committed to its shift, and once again, Planned Parenthood will have to respond to what has become a relentless push by anti-abortion activists, who seem all too willing to make women's access to health services a casualty in their war on reproductive rights.

To get more involved with Planned Parenthood's mission, check out their website.

This article is cross-posted at Trans/plant/portation.

Guess what? Subscriptions to Bitch—our award-winning, 80+ page print quarterly—are 20% off to help us reach our $25,000 funding goal by September 30. Pitch in to support feminist media: Subscribe today

Subscribe to Bitch


Comments

18 comments have been made. Post a comment.

About those screenings

Having read Bright-Sided and Pink Ribbon Blues, I am afraid the emphasis on "early detection" by Susan Komen and others is actually part of the problem, leading to unnecessary treatment, some cancers that wouldn't have been caused otherwise, all without much benefit to women. This is a totally gutless move on SBK's part, but it is just part of their larger myopia and "pinkwashing."

Obtaining undergo

Obtaining undergo Bright-Sided as well as Pinkish Bows Problems, Therefore i am scared primary upon "early detection" simply by Leslie Komen as well as others is really part of the problem, leading to needless therapy, a few malignancies which more than likely are actually brought on otherwise, just about all with small advantage to females. This can be a totally gutless proceed SBK's element, nevertheless it is merely part of their very own larger myopia along with "pinkwashing. inches. best meal replacement shakes

Having read Bright-Sided and

Having read Bright-Sided and Pink Ribbon Blues, We are reluctant the concentrate on "early detection" by Susan Komen while others is really area of the dilemma, resulting in unwanted treatment method, some cancers that wouldn't are already induced in any other case, all with little profit to women. This can be a completely gutless move ahead SBK's part, yet it's just portion of their larger myopia and "pinkwashing."

To say that 90% of what

To say that 90% of what Planned Parenthood does is abortions is insane. They were the only place that I could go to for care for a serious medical problem when I lost my health insurance! They took me in and took care of me when I needed help! Where else could I have gone? Planned Parenthood is a place for women to get NECESSARY medical care!
And NO, I have never had an abortion.

And even if you had,

And even if you had, Anonymous, that's your right!

Getting go through

Getting go through Bright-Sided and Pinkish Bows Troubles, Therefore i'm scared the focus on "early detection" by simply Leslie Komen yet others is actually portion of the issue, resulting in needless treatment, some malignancies which wouldn't are actually triggered or else, almost all with little advantage to women. This is a completely gutless move on SBK's aspect, however it is simply portion of their own bigger myopia and pinkwashing. nail fungus treatment

These were the sole location

These were the sole location which i could visit regarding take care of a critical healthcare issue once i dropped our medical health insurance! They will required myself within and also watched over myself once i required assist! Just where otherwise could We have vanished? Prepared Being a parent is really a location for ladies to obtain.

Getting go through

Getting go through Bright-Sided and Pinkish Bows Troubles, Therefore i'm scared the focus on "early detection" by simply Leslie Komen yet others is actually portion of the issue, resulting in needless treatment, some malignancies which wouldn't are actually triggered or else, almost all with little advantage to women. This is a completely gutless move on SBK's aspect, however it is simply portion of their own bigger myopia and "pinkwashing. inch

Dont know what you're talking

Dont know what you're talking about.

Planned Parenthood

Planned Parenthood lobbied the federal government to support reproductive health, culminating with President Richard Nixon's signing of Title X to provide governmental subsidies for low-income women to access family planning services.

Meuble Sur Mesure|Aménagement Sur Mesure

Thats Bright Sided

Titled “Planned Bullyhood” and due for publication Sept. 11, the book depicts Planned Parenthood as a partisan organization willing to weaken Komen to further a liberal political agenda. However, Handel—a conservative who resigned from Komen after its reversal—also assails Komen’s leadership as indecisive and politically naive, and says the decision to backtrack was a mistake.
zoekmachine optimalisatie

American Policy

Handel was hired by Komen as vice president for public policy in April 2011 after losing a Republican gubernatorial primary in Georgia, and was given the task of figuring out how to disengage Komen from Planned Parenthood. The grants from Komen were for breast-cancer education and screening, but the charity was under increasing pressure from anti-abortion groups and religious conservatives to cut all ties with Planned Parenthood because, in addition to its other services, it is the nation's leading provider of abortion.

business professionals - business risk related links

90% of

In some ways, the Komen decision isn’t particularly surprising. The group has been under pressure from antiabortion rights groups not to fund Planned Parenthood. It also hired a vice president last year who had previously advocated for the group’s defunding in her run for Georgia governor. With a congressional investigation underway, Komen pulled its support. And when private institutions move to cut off Planned Parenthood’s funding there’s not much Democrats can do.The only possible backstop here might be pressure from Planned Parenthood supporters pushing back in the opposite direction.
Zwemles

Great post

Having read Bright-Sided and Pink Ribbon Blues, I am afraid the emphasis on "early detection" by Susan Komen and others is actually part of the problem, leading to unnecessary treatment, some cancers that wouldn't have been caused otherwise, all without much benefit to women. This is a totally gutless move on SBK's part, but it is just part of their larger myopia and "pinkwashing."

The Sudden Pink War: Making Sense of the Komen/Planned

Hello, І enjoy reading all of yοur article.
ӏ like to write а little comment to support you.

Great Post

These prefabs are striking. Unfortunately, as much as I would like for the concept to become more widely used, cost will always be a limiting factor. Until, quality designs like the ones demonstrated can be constructed at a competitive price with field built construction, I believe that most cases we see will be demonstration houses or 3d model renderings. http://www.san-diego-video-production-company.htm

Good post

Your blog provided us with valuable information to work with. Each & every tips of your post are awesome. Thanks a lot for sharing. Keep blogging, www.priceflo.com

Good post

Your blog provided us with valuable information to work with. Each & every tips of your post are awesome. Thanks a lot for sharing. Keep blogging, http://www.priceflo.com/