Subscribe to Bitch—an award-winning, 80 page feminist magazine. Image Map

nationalim in sports

gazabasketball.jpg The LA Times is reporting the story of Turkish basketball fans protesting the war in Gaza at a game against Israeli team, Bnei Hasharon (http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/babylonbeyond/2009/01/israel-the-gaza.html.)

Indoors, the mood was red-hot with crowds chanting slogans against Israel and supporting Hamas.

Although police were present, things didn't cool down, and when fans threatened to charge the court, the Israeli team retreated and took cover in the locker rooms for three hours before being safely extricated.

At 3 a.m., the team was escorted by armed policemen from its hotel to the airport, where police continued to chaperon the players until boarding. Upon returning to Israel, the team said that the general mood had been less than friendly from the start, but that protesters in the arena had "murder in their eyes" and that they feared for their lives. They called the event "a Turkish nightmare." The Union of European Leagues of Basketball intends to penalize the Israeli team with a technical loss for refusing to play after the mess had been contained.

This is not the first time there's been violence (or threatened violence) at a sporting event. And it's certainly not violence that's particular to one sport; the Olympics, the NBA, the NHL, tennis, and soccer/football leagues throughout the world are among the many sites where violence has played out in sports. And while there are many who would rightfully suggest that what happened in Turkey was not violence, I would suggest that even if it wasn't, it was a site where nationalism played out. And if you unpeel the action of violence that occurs at sporting events throughout the world, you are left with nationalism more often than not.

This is no big revelation of mine. The Munich Olympics and English soccer games in particular have been studied over and over again--I've read all the studies, seen all the movies, and still get confused as to why nationalism plays out at sporting events.

But it was viewing the picture above that something sorta clicked with me. Something that helped me to make just a little bit of sense of it all.

Specifically, where are the women?

Now, before people throw out the easy answer (They are barbarians! They don't like women! They force women to stay home and have babies!), I want to twist this discussion around a bit.

How many fights, rumbles, protests, riots, murders, etc have taken place at women's sporting events? And then let's couple this question with another one: Why are women's sports chronically suffering from lack of interest, lack of funding, lack of opportunity for growth, etc?

Are the two questions related?

They are in so much as how nationalism defines women's (and men's) roles in society. Speaking as a U.S. citizen, women's sports is only admired and supported by 'the masses' as much as the women doing the sports can be sexualized. Take, as an example, this list (which is not uncommon on male centered sporting sites) of the 50 Hottest Female Olympians (http://sports.popcrunch.com/the-50-hottest-female-olympians-of-the-2008-...). Almost to a tee--every single one of the women are young, traditionally slender (no weightlifters anywhere!), posed in traditionally feminine poses (i.e. wearing bathing suits, lying on beds, eyes downcast), and with one exception--white.

And it's not like the representation of women in sports as young, white, assumed heterosexual, etc. is something new. We've talked earlier about how women are hyper-sexualized in U.S. sports (http://bitchmagazine.org/post/sex-positive-and-hyper-sexualization-in-sp...). To the point that most times, it appears that if you can play moderately well but qualify as a 'piece of ass' to the males, you will be a superstar.

What the preference for a certain body type/personality does is point to what women are valued in U.S. culture and why. White 'available' looking women that conform to traditional representations of femininity are good for fucking.They're good for showing the rest of the world what 'our nation' truly is. The best of the best. As for the rest of us? The women who don't fit into the best of the best that our individual nations have to offer? Well, what good are women that nobody (i.e. white men in the U.S.) wants to fuck?

Nationalism often hides how certain women are preferenced by focusing in on the men. "Non conforming" male bodies are written as deviant and/or sexualized--for example, the Turkish men at the basketball game had 'murder in their eyes' and were a 'Turkish nightmare,' thereby equating men who disagrees with the Israeli action in Gaza to terrorists (who else has 'murder in their eyes' or are written as just a tad beyond mentally psychotic?).

But while there is so much focus on men being maligned by nationalism, the bodies of women are *also* being erased from the national politic. In other words--the focusing on male bodies as deviant, terrorist, swarthy, etc, reinforces the subservient, violated Muslim woman in need of saving from the violent swarthy brown man trope. It reinforces the idea that Muslim women, no matter what they are doing, how they are resisting (whether it be sexism, invasion or both), exist solely as Western eyes *imagine* her: helpless, covered, absent, abused.

You see this in the U.S. as well. Take this passage from the amazing essay "You Told Harpo To Beat Me?": How Hip Hop Music Defines and Divides Black Women (http://celiesrevenge.blogspot.com/2008/12/you-told-harpo-to-beat-me-how-...):

When asked his take on the Don Imus controversy, Snoop Dogg said in defense of Hip Hop, "It's a completely different scenario. Rappers are not talking about no collegiate basketball girls who have made it to the next level in education and sports. We're talking about ho's that's in the 'hood that ain't doing shit, that's trying to get a nigga for his money. These are two separate things." Snoop Dogg stressed that rappers are not "old-ass white men that sit up on MSNBC going hard on Black girls. We are rappers that have these songs coming from our minds and our souls that are relevant to what we feel. I will not let them motherfuckers say we in the same league as him." Although he called what Snoop Dogg said ignorant and misogynistic, Black pro- feminist scholar Marc Anthony Neal defended Snoop Dogg in his piece "What's the Real Reason for the Sudden Attack on Hip Hop," by stating "At least he was being honest." Of course he couldn't bring himself to call Snoop's characterization of poor Black women elitist. A gangster rapper acting elitist?! That would fly in the face of Snoop's and Hip Hop's much needed image: processors of infallible "street cred." Never mind that there are tons of examples of Hip Hop music bashing poor people. However, as long as the targets are primarily poor women, it's all good!

So in other words, the women who were *called* nappy headed ho's were almost completely forgotten as Don Imus duked it out with community defenders of black womenhood, Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson (and with the occasional shout of outrage from Snoop, et al). But even as they were forgotten--black women became little more than what black and white men *imagined* them to be: good girls worthy of defense and protection and bad girls worthy of disrespect--but infuriatingly, all of the women, no matter what type of girl they are, are *imagined* to be sexually usable/rapable.

Although white women in the U.S. generally have much more success negotiating sports, nationalism and misogyny than women of color do, they are often cast in the same unenviable position as black women in sports--even those deemed "good girls" are deemed so because of their sexuality. And as such, 'good girls' are just as rapable as 'bad girls' are.

So what is the answer here? When sports are so heavily intertwined with hyper-masculine, many times violent nationalism--is getting women more involved in sports really the answer?

Or, like everything else in the world, is the answer much more complicated than that?

Does it make a difference that men don't fight their nationalistic politics at women's sporting events? Yes. Because it demonstrates how little value men really place on the bodies of women. Women are objects that make sense in so far as they can be sexualized/fucked--they are not strident players and "deciders" in the game of politics. They are not people to take seriously with real opinions that must be deferred to.

The culture of sports much be changed just as much as integrating women in to sports is must happen. How to do that changing, however--you've got me.

What do you think?

Enjoy reading this article? Good news! Our quarterly magazine, Bitch: Feminist Response to Pop Culture, is packed with 80+ pages of feminist analysis, reviews, illustrations, and more. Subscribe today!

Subscribe to Bitch

Comments

3 comments have been made. Post a comment.

"The perception that women's

"The perception that women's sports somehow don't count as much as men's sports in the minds of some fans (all men, I might add) took a hit when fans set bonfires and began rioting in spite of the university's drafting of new riot policies." This is what happend after the "Terrapin women's basketball team made history by winning its first-ever national championship." - http://media.www.diamondbackonline.com/media/storage/paper873/news/2006/...

thanks so much for the link,

thanks so much for the link, it's a really great read!

La Macha
Editor: Vivir Latino
La Macha on Twitter: http://twitter.com/lamacha

La Macha
Editor: Vivir Latino
La Macha on Twitter: http://twitter.com/lamacha

Women fail to understand the underlying realities of many issues

Before I get started let me say I enjoyed this article, but I definitely hold the opinion of what I consider almost all men. These inequalities are not the work of ignorance or racism, but unfortunately for women, they are the results of reality. While seemingly unfair, no argument or movement can change the way things are. Women are fighting for something that they don't understand, doesn't exist; innate equality.
Being an economics major I'll explain it in my own terms. Our society is built on value, the very rich representing great value to society, and the very poor representing the worthless. And yes we all know that money supposedly "isn't everything", citing the nearly negligible traits that money doesn't influence or reflect. While there is something to be said about people being nice, honest etc. being important, it still doesn't change that a lot of money is only earned through providing a lot of value. The pathetically ignorant self esteem movement nowadays likes to spread hope and joy and love and that everyone's equal, and a bunch of other complete bullshit that people love to eat up. It isn't hard to see the true tactics of what is actually a strategy. In motivating everyone that they are special, all the actual special kids will be motivated. People like to look the other way for some reason and deny this sort of thing for countless reasons. The main point being the sky is in fact not the limit for many people and that no matter how much you want or try or deserve some things, they will never come.
While it's very possible women have something they are best at, it only appears that men can do everything women can do, and better. Women's segregated sports being the perfect example. While women are naturally built different than men, as far as sports go this is inferior. Short and scrawny men not being able to play football earns them no separate league to accommodate this inadequacy, while all women's sports are the equivalent of such a thing. Men's sports represent the pinnacle of athletic competition, while women's sports will always just be the top women competing for whatever that's worth. So it should be obvious why the only thing that female athlete's seem to get appreciated for is how much men would like to have sex with them. Because if you take away a woman's sex appeal, for example in the WNBA, where it's virtually nonexistent anyways...since tall muscular women are not sexy, the talent while good, could be matched by thousands of collegiate male players.
Sports are fundamentally a competition, and women's sports exist not because they aren't allowed to play with men, but because they aren't good enough. Women's sports can exist separately, but in doing so reduces itself to recreation. They are fundamentally different, there is no men's sports and women's sports, there is sports, and since women don't show up on the radar, they play by themselves. There is no value outside of sex, because besides that, there is nothing of value to offer. I have an older sister, who i can assure you has never lost any sleep over the fact that she's no good at video games. Nor does she claim any innate right to play under conditions where she can compete. My sister wasted no time bickering over having to compete with men, and instead found something where she excelled as a human being. If women want to be treated equal they have to accept that men and women are in fact not equal in every category, and learn to embrace it. If women want to be treated as equals, they can't ignorantly believe that having no control over certain things makes a deficiency somehow not a deficiency.