Girls Just Wanna Play With Dolls
Mattel has recently released Barbie versions of Joan Jett, Cyndi Lauper and Debbie Harry as part of its “Ladies of the 80s” series. Stare into the empty plasticized eyes of your youth!!


I’d rather see a child playing with a Joan Jett doll than Malibu Beach Barbie or a Bratz, but the dolls still look pretty much like your everyday Barbie (with a few alterations for individual features) gussied up in rock star costumes. They’re marketed as collector's items, but they’re only $35 – more expensive than a regular Barbie, but still affordable enough to be actual playthings for actual children. Rock stars being marketed as superhuman idols is standard, but it is strange that such openly sexual and endlessly sexualized music icons are being immortalized in plastic, anatomically incorrect form. But if a Joan Jett doll can lead a little girl to Joan Jett’s music, attitudes and activism, then maybe it’s not such a bad idea.

What do you think? Does the “Ladies of the 80s” series elevate Mattel, or does it degrade the women it portrays? And is it wrong that I kind of want one?
Help keep all of our online content free and accessible. Donate today!
Comments
6 comments have been made. Post a comment.Email List Signup
Latest Issue
Show us your tips!
Have an idea for the blog? Click here to contact us!
Recent comments
Tweet! Tweet! Check out our Twitter feed!
Think discussion here is lively?
See what folks are saying on Facebook!
-BlogHer
-Broadsheet
-BUST Magazine
-The Curvature
-Double X
-Fbomb
-Feminist Law Professors
-Feminist Peace Network
-Feministe
-Feministing
-Feminist Review
-FWD/Forward
-Guanabee
-The Hater
-Hip Mama
-In Other Words
-Jezebel
-Love in the Living Room
-Midwest Teen Sex Show
-Muslimah Media Watch
-Our Bodies Our Blog
-Pandagon
-The Pursuit of Harpyness
-RaceWire
-Racialicious
-RH Reality Check
-Shapely Prose
-Target Women
-Tiger Beatdown
-The Root
-TransGriot
-Viva La Feminista
-Women In Media and News
-Women's Rights -- Change.org
-Womanist Musings
Take note:
Opinions expressed on this website are those of their respective authors, not necessarily those of Bitch. Dig?







![sm[art] an auction to benefit bitch magazine sm[art] an auction to benefit bitch magazine](http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2226/1831690272_e9f74bba8d_m.jpg)




























errr . . . don't you need
errr . . . don't you need the permission of a person to make a doll of their likeness to sell? is that something we should be discussing?
Joan Jett doll
I think the Joan Jett doll kinda looks more like Siouxsie Sioux. Undecided yet how I feel about Mattel marketing rock stars. Perhaps it's a good thing, but maybe they could put more effort into anatomically correct. And little girls probably won't play with them unless mommy who knows who joan is gives it to her. I think these dolls are more collectors' items than anything.
Thank you for the post, i am
Thank you for the post, i am quite impressed.
Personally I love them, as
Personally I love them, as collector items only. For 80's nostalgia. Degrading women? Näää. but giving young girls the wrong idea about body image, yes.
The thing that bothers me
The thing that bothers me the most is that to be a celebrity Barbie Doll (or any doll) is to have a real person "adjusted" to look more glamourous and "pretty" than who they are based on.
I'm a little afraid when kids go to investigate the real Joan Jett they'll find someone scrubby and weird and HUMAN and be turned off. I'm hoping that's not going to happen....but who knows...
Also: I'm a little horrified that some of my bratty adolescent idols are now Barbies. Egads.
dgfdgfd
It seems that designer louis vuitton bags are all the rage these days.
We have huge variety of quality products like louis vuitton handbags etc.
The lv bags was heavy on messengers, and the ones that combined logo leather with smooth in different colors were probably the best bags of the show,