Tube Tied: Dollhouse's "Epitaph One": Still Confused, Still Worth Watching
I don't imagine many of you are Dollhouse viewers, not least because the new series by Joss Whedon of Buffy and Angel fame had a rocky ride of a first season. If you gave up on him, I have a new mantra for you: Joss is always worth the trouble. Joss identifies as a feminist, and indeed, before anybody scoffs or points to Buffy's short skirts or what have you, I encourage you to read this.
That said, Dollhouse ain't perfect, on feminist or any other grounds, frankly. I only managed to stick it out through its initial rough patch on faith alone. See, Fox forced Joss to retool the show and rearrange some plot development early on. This led to some awfully confusing early episodes in which the network's desire to sell the show as Sexy! seemed at odds with Joss's own plans. The premise of the show being a brothel staffed by people who have, literally, had personality lobotomies, this isn't just in bad taste - it is bad marketing.
But once the show got on its feet, it grew into a reasonably compelling allegory of what the universe is looking for in its sex objects: empty vessels. The concept suffers, though, when the show gets flip about its context in its "monster-of-the-week" episodes. (For example: Dushku saves child from kidnappers; Dushku looks totes hot whilst doing so, although wearing glasses.) See, the problem with such a creepy premise is that it's hard to ignore it, even for a second. Cheering Eliza Dushku on, as she adopts the guise of some new personality to solve a murder or save a child, is tough. I have no problem with moral ambiguity in drama, but the central thrust of the show is so morally unambiguous that even the writers seem thoroughly unsure who we're supposed to root for. And fables don't operate that welll when they have neither heroes nor antiheroes.
So despite the dramatic strength of the last few episodes, Dollhouse still seems to me to be a little lost.
Further developments are bearing this out. Last month, at Comic-Con, Joss screened what was meant to be the thirteenth episode of the season, "Epitaph One" - you may now download it at iTunes. Originally developed to complete a contractual obligation, Fox actually declined to air this episode, although it renewed the show for a second season in a semi-shocking decision It's hard to find out why, exactly, though Joss himself has said it may have been related to the content of the episode:
"It has a very different structure and feel from what we do on Dollhouse, so it would have been ridiculously startling to have aired it the week after the season finale as just this insane coda," he says. "And it is a little bit insane, except that we sort of follow everything through to its logical conclusion. As always, it's logical to conclude that people are terrible and will try to destroy each other."
"Epitaph One" is a flash-forward and almost operates as a spoiler in and of itself. There are many points in its favour: it stars the eminently likable Felicia Day (from Joss's internet hit Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog), it gives the entire series a sense of narrative purpose that it previously lacked, it minimizes Eliza Dushku's screen time. I don't have to spoil much for you to say that the episode immediately introduces a world in which the Dollhouse technology has slowly infiltrated the general population, and there is a war ongoing between "actuals" (who have not yet been touched by the personality wipe technology) and Dolls who have been imprinted to kill them. From there it devolves into a sort of horror show. I'll leave the rest for you to discover.
Joss does not, actually have the writing credit for this episode, though it is "based on a story" by him. But since it is the series' overall direction that I think poses both the most potential and the most problems for the future of the show, I want to ask him: what gives? Because the funny thing is, by the end of Epitaph One, there is little trace of the themes of rape and violation that threaded through the strongest episodes of the first season. All of a sudden, the problem is that the Dolls are killing, being employed as soldiers, not that there are Dolls at all. Not that even the mere idea of using someone else's body in this way is abhorrent enough, that it does not matter who uses the technology and for what purpose: using other people, dehumanizing them
in the way the Dollhouse does is just plain WRONG, any way you slice it, and particularly from a feminist perspective. So why this shift in the series, to make the ultimate story arc about who is using the technology, rather than the abhorrence of the technology itself? I suppose it gives the series a better bad guy to go after in the long-term, but this is a strange sacrifice to make in a show that seems to want to reside in gray areas.
Any of you have any thoughts?
Photo from Gage Skidmore @ Flickr on a Creative Commons License.
Comments4 comments have been made. Post a comment.
Have an idea for the blog? Click here to contact us!
May the Box Office Be Ever in Your Favor: How Divergent and The Hunger Games Avoid Race and Gender ViolenceFiona Fire (not verified)
anouk (not verified)
Anonymous (not verified)
Allison (not verified)
Darcy_8552 (not verified)