Angry white men's votes count too!
Via Jezebel, a deeply confusing op-ed from the Aspen Times Weekly. Is it satire? Sincerity? Sheer douchebaggery? All of the above? Ultimately, one point is clear: The writer hates him some Hillary Clinton.
"[T]he Angry White Man loathes Hillary Clinton. Her voice reminds him of a shovel scraping a rock. He recoils at the mere sight of her on television. Her very image disgusts him, and he cannot fathom why anyone would want her as their leader. It’s not that she is a woman. It’s that she is who she is. It’s the liberal victim groups she panders to, the “poor me” attitude that she represents, her inability to give a straight answer to an honest question, his tax dollars that she wants to give to people who refuse to do anything for themselves. There are many millions of Angry White Men. Four million Angry White Men are members of the National Rifle Association, and all of them will vote against Hillary Clinton, just as the great majority of them voted for George Bush. He hopes that she will be the Democratic nominee for president in 2008, and he will make sure that she gets beaten like a drum."
It's hard to say what's most insane about this piece—the racism? the sexism? the obsession with owning firearms?—but it is interesting that writer Gary Hubbell, so clearly one of the Angry White Man of which he speaks, completely lacks the stones to own his clueless entitlement, instead attributing it to the four million AWM of whom he speaks. Perhaps he was afraid that a piece titled, "Hey, everyone — I'm really threatened by the idea that I'm no longer the center of the universe" would get laughed out of the newsroom?
Help keep all of our online content free and accessible. Donate today!
Comments
6 comments have been made. Post a comment.Email List Signup
Latest Issue
BitchTapes
Show us your tips!
Have an idea for the blog? Click here to contact us!
Recent comments
Tweet! Tweet! Check out our Twitter feed!
Hittin' the Links!
-BlogHer
-Broadsheet
-BUST Magazine
-The Curvature
-Double X
-Feminist Law Professors
-Feminist Peace Network
-Feministe
-Feministing
-Feminist Review
-Guanabee
-The Hater
-Jezebel
-Midwest Teen Sex Show
-Muslimah Media Watch
-Our Bodies Our Blog
-Pandagon
-RaceWire
-Racialicious
-RH Reality Check
-Shapely Prose
-Target Women
-The Root
-TransGriot
-Viva La Feminista
-Women In Media and News
-Women's Rights -- Change.org
-Womanist Musings
Take note:
Opinions expressed on this website are those of their respective authors, not necessarily those of Bitch. Dig?





















Ummmmm
You're getting your news from and linking to Jezebel, huh? I really want to like the Bitch blog, and I know that no blog can please everyone all the time, but I am disappointed.
re: Ummmmm
anonymous, can you elaborate? I get some news from Jezebel, yes. All the news? Hardly. Linking to a source doesn't denote wholesale support -- as you'll see in the new issue, I have a definite beef with aspects of Jezebel. But I would likely never have come across this story without Jezebel on my blogroll, and linking seems like the polite thing to do, no?
Ummmmmm, yeah, I know
I'm saddened if the only outlet (besides the Bitch blog) that mentioned this story was a website of questionable quality and content. (And as an aside, I know I could stand to do a lot of work on my little judgementalness problem, that's a given) And linking is the polite thing to do, I agree. I guess if it's a pertinent story that came from Jezebel I feel conflicted, like taking doctor-prescribed medication that's tested on animals - a necessary evil but not good.
I think I'm extra nit-picky with the Bitch blog because I'm more critical of those I love, and hold them to a higher standard. Like seeing the left-wing media be sexist, it's extra disappointing when the news source you love does something you don't like.
Anyhoo, the other reason I was feeling sensitive to the J-link is because I'm getting really tired and frustrated with the incestuous blogosphere group-think. This is my final beef, and then I will stop being the commenter who always complains ;-)
Reading cross-linked story after story online and then logging off and turning on NPR, for instance, is like leaving a small echo-y room full of children yelling and emerging into a comfortable sitting room where there is an adult conversation. By current feminist blog standards I seem to be a crotchety, old, hairy-legged, fuddy-duddy; I am a 27-year-old former sex worker, drug user, gambling and porn addict who has traveled to Russia and West Africa, and sites like Jezebel make me feel like I'm old enough to be the bloggers mother! So I guess I'm sensitive to the online culture by whose standards I am tragically unhip and outdated (If I was still a drug addict and a sex worker I would be so cool!) and when my favorite magazine cum online media outlet seemed to endorse the culture I feel so rejected by I got my panties in a little bit of a bunch.
So, that's my elaboration. It's me, not you, and aren't you glad you asked?
Definitely worth addressing in the next issue of Bitch!
It's unfortunate that faux-maverick McCain wrapped up the GOP nomination so early, because it gives millions of AWM the opportunity to register as democrats during upcoming state primaries for the sole purpose of ensuring that a woman never becomes president of the US. (Of course, not that they're sexist or anything. As they love to constantly remind us, their hatred for Hillary is not at all related to the fact that she is a woman. And I'm sure they'll find many other thinly-veiled excuses to hate the next woman that tries to run for president in twenty years.)
But what really saddens me is how much the deck was stacked against Hillary from the start, and how little public discussion of these double standards was allowed in the media, or with my fellow "liberals" at bars. (Hillary herself was shouted down by the press when she said that she was treated unfairly.)
I only wish that the media/society would discuss the numerous ways that Hillary was handicapped by political double-standards:
And I could go on, but I'm too depressed. Someone should probably take this AWM crap up and do a story on it though. The presidential campaign gives us a good idea of how thick the glass ceiling is at the top. This would make a good story for the fall/winter issue of Bitch when the US elects its next white male. :-(
~Jonathan
PS. Hothead '08
"If people cannot imagine alternatives, they won't seek them, and that's more conducive to the authoritarian agenda than walls and barbed wire."
women are not a minority
Women are generally oppressed, but are not, in fact, a "minority" (roughly half the population, as we know) and trying to label as such is more disempowering than beneficial.
Agreed that the media needs more balanced coverage overall and could take some lessons in critical thinking, but I hope they never start referring (again) to women as a minority.
On a side note, it would be really nice if our representative democracy was even vaguely demographically representative (by gender, race, sexuality, etc.) - if it were, there would sure be a lot more women in power.
Profound ambivalence
Everything that has been said here is all too true. The way the mainstream media cover Hillary is so sexist I can barely contain my rage. I really want to leap to her defense.
But...
I could never vote for her (well, I take that back: if it's between her and whatever jingoistic autocrat the GOP has running, I'll vote for her). Her voting record on the war is dismal. I have heard nothing from her indicating she'll get us out of this bloody, wasteful, immoral, illegal war we're in. So I just can't say I support her as a candidate. I only support her as a woman, and wish the media would treat her equally.
BTW - I find it rather insulting that the media are calling her the first "serious" female candidate...we've had *several* women run for president, and all of them were serious. Hey, that might make an interesting story, esp. Victoria Woodhull Claflin... (hint, hint).